TSTP Solution File: CSR119^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR119^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:52:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.12 % Problem : CSR119^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 20:17:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LyDoIhut0j/Vampire---4.8_6104
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6295)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6294)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6293)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6291)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6290)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6292)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (6294)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.37 % (6288)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (6289)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.15/0.38 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(func_def_13, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f24,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 $false),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f23,f11])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)) )),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ! [X0] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ~? [X0] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ~? [X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.38 ~? [X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.38 ? [X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LyDoIhut0j/Vampire---4.8_6104',con)).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f22])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f22,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & $true)))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f10,f21])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(condensation,[],[f18])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)) )),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f14])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)) )),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f13])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))) )),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f12])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f11,f10])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.15/0.38 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.15/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LyDoIhut0j/Vampire---4.8_6104',ax)).
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (6294)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (6287)Success in time 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------